At a time when developing regions like Africa are trying to get their immigrants in the West to give back to the communities they left behind, a UN group mandated to monitor arms shipments in and out of the Horn of Africa is working hard to deny Americans of Eritrean origin the right to remit assistance to their relatives in the Red Sea nation which is suffering from 40-years of war.
An E-SMART Press Release Finally, the Somalia and Eritrean Monitoring Group has admitted that there is no evidence of Eritrean support in Somalia.
E-SMART Member (July 6, 2012) Yesterday the U.S. Treasury Department froze the assets of two Eritrean government officials ostensibly because "The United States is determined to target those who are responsible for the ongoing bloodshed and instability in Somalia," said Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Director Adam J. Szubin.
This begs the question: who is responsible for the bloodshed and instability in Somalia?
The paper takes a close look at Eritrea's relations with both the US and the UN over the last six decades in an attempt to make sense of the December 23, 2009 UN Security Council decision to impose sanctions on this young African nation based on groundless charges. A careful analysis of the historical records shows an unmistakable pattern of betrayals of and injustice against the people of Eritrea by the West in general and the US in particular, as well as the United Nations and the African Union (formerly Organization of African Union (OAU). The analysis reveals in a stark way that U.S. foreign policy for the Horn of Africa has been generally devoid of fairness and justice--always skewed to favor Ethiopia, and always at the expense of the region in general, and especially Eritrea and the Eritrean people in particular.
The recent US-led UN Security Council decision to impose sanctions on Eritrea based on groundless charges has once again shown the world body’s total disregard for the truth, especially in dealing with vulnerable Third World nations.